Home > Space, Transport > Space Elevators

Space Elevators


Thanks to Jos Walker for suggesting this topic.  In 1895 the Eiffel Tower, a technological marvel of its time, inspired Konstantin Tsiolkovsky to ponder what would happen if it had been built tall enough to reach in to space.  He suggested a height of 35 790 kilometres, and that a ‘celestial castle’ be built at the top.  This castle, obviously, would constantly remain over the same spot on the surface – a geostationary orbit.  The idea was ahead of the materials science of the day, as no substance existed which would be able to support its own weight in such a massive structure.  In 1959, as the space race began, it was another Russian scientist, Yuri Artsutanov, who suggested a variation on the idea. His idea was to have a satellite which would lower a cable to the surface of the earth, whilst at the same time deploying a counter-weight on a cable in to a higher orbit.  He also proposed tapering the cable thickness so that the tension in the cable was constant—this gives a thin cable at ground level, thickening up towards geostationary orbit.

Space Elevator

Space Elevator

In 1965 four American physicists proposed a very similar idea in the journal Nature, but even then it was decided that no substance existed which would be strong enough to build the required cable of over 35 000 kilometres.   It was not until the development of carbon nanotubes in the 1990s that materials science was able to support the concept, which could become a reality in the 21st century.  It has been suggested that the establishment of a prize, along the lines of the Asari X-prize, may speed up development.  As recently as 2008 a book, titled “Leaving the Planet by Space Elevator”, was published in Japanese and became a best-seller in Japan.  As a result the Japanese government have committed to building a space-elevator at an estimated cost of some £5 billion. 

In a conventional elevator the car is raised by pulling on cables.  The space elevator would use a cable that would remain stationary, and the elevator would ‘climb’ up the cable.  Several power sources have been suggested, but the emerging favourite is to use a megawatt laser in conjunction with 10m wide mirrors at various heights on the cable.  If the counterwight was at a distance of 144 000 Km,then ‘firing’ a vessel from that distance would impart enough velocity to escape Earth’s gravitational pull.  The concept is very much in vogue, and Nasa are considering the viability of a space elevator, and even building one on Mars to aid the colonisation of the planet.

Advertisements
Categories: Space, Transport
  1. Conor Gricmanis
    06/01/2010 at 8:46 pm

    Wow, what can I say?!?! this blog is so usefull to me, I have taken technologie for my GCSE’s, and most of this I need, or I need to study on! thank you so much!, Conor

    • 06/01/2010 at 8:51 pm

      Connor – it is my pleasure. I am enthusiastic about technology and will try to post most days. Try to visit my blog regularly, and don’t forget to tell your friends 😉

  2. Conor Gricmanis
    06/01/2010 at 8:57 pm

    no worries! I CANT WAIT TO TELL MY FRIENDS! 😀 wow, i cant wait to even tell my science teacher and my tech teacher! 😀

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s